Undergraduate Research Symposium

Thank you for joining us at the 2023 CLAS Undergraduate Research Symposium!

Symposium winners received scholarship support generously provided by the Sievert Family Endowed Scholarship in Research, Internship, Service and Engagement.

2023 CLAS Undergraduate Research Symposium

Presentations

Researcher(s) Topic
Ballmann, Liz Activator Free C-to-N Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis
Belden, Lane Claiming the People's Home: Competing Uses of Folkhemmet in Sweden's Radical Right and Center Left
Ghanem, Carly Economic Relief Provided by the OLLIF Surgical Technique
Grougan, Morgan LoA (Librarian of Alexandria): An AI-Powered Linux-Python Tool for Comprehensive Extraction of Chemical Data
Habashy, Sophie Wayne County PM2.5 Levels on Lab Visit Days Among Youth With Asthma: A Methodological Approach
Haygood, Katelynn Distinguishing the Pax6 Paralogs Eyeless and Twin of Eyeless
Jonatzke, Kira A Transposon Insertion Site Identifies Two Potential Genes That Regulate a Developmental Switch in C. Elegans
Patel, Taral Wayne County PM2.5 Levels on Lab Visit Days Among Youth With Asthma: A Methodological Approach
Soltesz, Lexi Mild Intermittent Hypoxia: A Prophylactic for Autonomic Dysfunction in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injuries
Teran, Mahmoud Utilization of In vivo Longitudinal PET Imaging to Assess Class IIa HDAC Activity Following Long-Term Extinction Fear Memory in Female and Male Rats
Watson, Bex Claiming the People's Home: Competing Uses of Folkhemmet in Sweden's Radical Right and Center Left

FAQS

  • What makes a good undergraduate research presentation?

    Look for clarity of ideas and how the big picture is explained. What is the problem to be addressed, or idea to be developed? The work should make the methods clear and discuss the results in a broader context.

  • What should attendees consider before voting?

    Look for the scientific structure: Problem ➡️ hypothesis or motivation ➡️ methods ➡️ results and discussion ➡️ conclusion.

    Some works in humanities have a more flexible structure and do not have a working hypothesis. The work should be consistent in its objectives and accomplishments. Notice that a hypothesis is "the best guess" on how to address an idea and sometimes the observed results differ from the hypothesis. This is not a problem and only indicates that new research is needed using a different hypothesis.

  • What questions should I ask about the research?

    Any question addressing the research structure is welcome. There are no "wrong" questions, and great discussion arises when the audience asks:

    • Is this problem important?
    • Were you able to validate your hypothesis?
    • If not, what would make for a better hypothesis?
    • Are there alternative methods to test and evaluate your research?
    • Would they be better, worse, why?
    • How do your results fit with other similar data?
    • What was learned?
    • Is this applicable?

More about undergraduate research at Wayne State